| |
|
|
| Unfriendly
Fire |
| Mohan
Mainali in Dhading
Centre for Investigatve Journalism |
| |
It
is a steep two-hour uphill from the Prithvi Highway to Jogimara
in Dhading district. And even from a distance, we can sense
the stillness in the air. The village has only older people
and children, they all wear a haunted look. They sit on
their front porches, with shocked listlessness.
It
has been nearly six months since 17 young men from Jogimara
were killed while working on an airport runway at Kalikot
in western Nepal. Their families don’t have any tears
left, but grief stillsears their hearts. Almost every family
has lost a breadwinner, but no bodies were ever returned.
There are 10 widows, 18 orphans and 14 bereaved parents
at Jogimara.
Today,
they are trapped between the need to come to terms with
the deaths of their loved ones, a future of destitution
and despair, and a government that calls them relatives
of terrorists.
On
24 Feburary, 800 km away from home, the young men found
themselves in the wrong place at the wrong time. Piecing
together information from survivors, it is clear that the
killing was a tragic combination of mistaken identity and
other errors. And half-a-year later, this Dhading village
is proof of the senselessness of the violence that has been
unleashed on the Nepali people in the name of Maoism, and
the callousness of officialdom. |
| |
 |
Caption
for this photo |
| |
In
late November, just when the Maoists broke the truce and
attacked the army in Dang, Jogimara’s poorest of the
poor were getting ready to go to Kalikot. They went because
they trusted the sub-contractor, Kumar Thapa. They knew
him, he had never cheated them, and he was even willing
to pay an advance. And they needed the money. Of the 20
Jogimara men who left, only three returned alive. Among
the dead were nine who were under 21 years old.
“More
than the cold and the hardships, we were afraid of the Maoists,”
recalls Bel Bahadur BK from the original group. He returned
home with two other villagers after a helicopter fired at
the workers on 3 January. “We didn’t want to
die out there.”
A
month later, the Maoists attacked Mangalsen and Sanfebagar,
killing 137 soldiers and policemen. The security forces
went on a three-pronged hot pursuit northwards. The fleeing
Maoists infiltrated the construction workers in Kalikot,
and fired on an army helicopter flying overhead. Fearing
army retaliation, the contractor told his men not to come
to work and everyone had their identity papers ready in
case the security forces came looking for Maoists.
On
24 February, an army attack force stormed the quarters,
thinking the workers were Maoists. According to eye-witness
reports given to the National Human Rights Commission, 17
workers from Dhading, seven from Sindhupalchok, and 11 local
villagers were killed. Among the villagers were the ward
chairman from the Nepali Congress, two Sherpas from Solukhumbu
who were working in Kalikot and two minors. Two workers
from Sindhupalchok managed to survive. All the Maoists had
fled by the time the soldiers arrived. That week, the Defence
Ministry statement said 67 Maoists had been killed in encounters
in Kalikot.
A
senior army source told us that the security forces had
reliable reports that the Kalikot area was where many of
the Maoists who took part in the Mangalsen attack were hiding.
“The Maoists had infiltrated the workers,” he
said. “But in hindsight, it is clear that the Maoists
were provoking us to attack the workers and make it look
like we were killing civilians.” The survivors say
that the Maoists had been coming around regularly to threaten
them to stop work on the airport. They would refuse, but
the Maoists would demand a meal, after which they would
leave.
The
fact that the Maoists shot at the helicopter using the workers
as human shields bolsters the argument that the rebels were
trying to trap the army into attacking civilians. But all
this is of little consolation to the families, and it is
clear that the attack in Kalikot was a colossal blunder.
For the families of the dead in Dhading and Sindhupalchok,
the wounds haven’t healed with time. This is mainly
because they never got the bodies of their loved ones. No
one ever came to apologise or tell them that it was a mistake.
And to make matters even worse, as far as the government
is concerned, their sons and fathers were all “terrorists”.
Dambar
Bahadur Thapa lost his 17-year-old son. He says, “They
were quiet kids, they never got into any trouble, they were
just working hard to make some money to send back to their
families.” Gyan Bahadur Biswokarma lost two sons aged
30 and 25, and has only now decided to hold a funeral service
for them. Shankha Bahadur Gurung lost two of his five sons,
one 21 and the other 19. He had decided to go to Kalikot
to see for himself after hearing the news, but the other
villagers stopped him. Most other villagers have by now
given up on their sons being alive, and are carrying out
funerals on ritual pyres.
As
the priest makes final preparations for Raj Kumar Shrestha’s
funeral, his mother is weeping loudly inside the house.
Raj Kumar’s wife Gita gave birth to a girl a month
ago, but the baby died. His father Bel Bahadur is assisting
the priest. “Console yourself,” the priest mutters
in between chants. “The dead don’t come back
no matter how much we want them to.” That makes things
worse, and the weeping is louder. Raj Kumar’s five-year
old son Amrit and his younger brother are playing marbles
with a friend nearby, oblivious of what is going on.
“Three
weeks after the incident there were rumours that they had
been killed, another three months later the contractor called
us to Kathmandu and gave us their wages,” recalls
Bel Bahadur. “It was then that we finally believed
our son was dead.” The private contractor also gave
them Rs 3,300 each for funeral expenses. The government
hasn’t shown any such concern.
Eight
of the dead are Praja families, and they still don’t
accept the deaths of their loved ones. They refuse to carry
out the funeral rites, and hope against hope that their
sons will one day appear. “Kumle had promised to come
back by the mid-April, in time to help with sowing corn,”
says his mother Ninna Praja, tears welling up in her eyes.
“We will wait for him forever, there was no reason
for him to die.”
Fourteen-year-old
Govinda Praja lost his 60-year-old father Chitra Bahadur.
“I still hope my father escaped, maybe he could have
been delayed because of the difficulties of coming back,”
Govinda told us. “We had tried to discourage him from
going so far away.” However, Chitra Bahadur, decided
to go because there was no work, his debt was piling up
and he had no more cattle, goats or crops to sell. Govinda’s
mother Sukmaya is so torn by grief and worry that she hasn’t
spoken to anyone for months. In addition to his four little
borthers and sisters, Govinda now also has to take care
of his mother. |
| |
 |
| Kaman
Maya Praja and Syani Praja |
| |
Two
young teenage widows, Kaman Maya Praja and Syani Praja,
still have terrified looks. They are living with their joint
families, unsure of what lies ahead. Indra Bahadur Thapa
lost his 16-year-old son, Gyan Bahadur in Kalikot. “Before
leaving he had asked us to take good care of the cattle
and not to borrow too much money,” Indra Bahadur told
us before looking away to wipe his tears. “He wanted
earn enough to pay for his schooling.”
It
was only after the news of the death of innocents rocked
parliament in March that Singha Darbar took notice. Prime
Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba told parliament on 6 March that
the government was taking care to ensure that the innocent
were not killed, and that if that happened, they would be
adequately compensated. The Prime Minister’s Office
also set up a special committee headed by Rishikesh Gautam
to hear and investigate complaints. When we contacted the
committee for comment, its members were still unaware of
the men from Jogimara who were killed in Kalikot.
Shree
Kanta Regmi, secretary of the committee, told us that his
office had not received any application from the families
of the deceased. The bureaucracy’s wheels don’t
start turning until a formal application is received, and
Regmi told us that newspaper reports were not enough. “We
will look into the cases as soon as we receive complaints,”
he assured us.
However,
two former MPs, Prem Bahadur Singh and Rajendra Pandey,
said that they have handed over the claims from the families
of the dead to Gautam. The two also say that they personally
informed the prime minister about the incident. The contractor
who hired the workers, Subha Karki Nirman Sewa took the
matter up with the National Human Rights Commission and
the Civil Aviation Authority of Nepal. But even the NHRC
was not able to get help for the families, nor did it deem
it necessary to conduct an independent investigation into
the issue.
Shocking as the tragedy is, what is even more appalling
for the families in Jogimara is the government’s indifference
to their plight. As we prepared to leave, one villager told
us: “We’ve not just lost our children, but the
government has branded them terrorists. Where is justice?”
(With additional reporting by Bhup Raj Khadka) |
| |
|
| Killed
in Kalikot |
• Of the 17 killed in Jogimara, nine were under 21.
The dead left 10 widows, 18 orphans, and
14 bereaved parents.
•
Of the nine workers from Sindhupalchok, two survived.
• Eight villagers were killed, including the Nepali
Congress ward chairman and two Sherpas
from Solu Khumbu.
•
Three others, including the sub-contractor, also died.
Names of the Jogimara dead, 17 from 15 families.
Chitra Bahadur Praja, Budha Bahadur Praja, Kumle Praja,
Sher Bahadur Praja, Dilli Praja, Ram Bahadur Praja, Bikas
Praja, Kanchha Praja, Gokarna Gurung, Tek Bahadur Gurung,
Gokarna Thapa, Manju Thapa, Bhim Bahadur Thapa, Gyan Bahadur
Thapa, Jhakka Bahadur Balchhane, Raj Kumar Shrestha, Raj
Kumar Biswokarma, Tek Bahadur Biswokarma, Sanu Biswokarma
and Bel Bahadur Biswokarma.
(Nepali Times) |
| |
|
Letters |
Unfriendly
fire
The powerful article by Mohan Mainali (“Unfriendly
fire”, #106) moved many of us. Whoever was responsible
for the original massacre—whether it was the Maoists
for provoking the army attack, or the army for not making
an effort to distinguish guerrillas from civilians—it
is clear that even six months later, there has been no effort
by the state to redress the misery and loss of the families
of the dead. When will those in power in Kathmandu ever
understand that it is exactly this heartlessness and indifference
to the suffering of citizens that gave birth to the Maoist
insurgency in the first place?
G Lamsal,
Kathmandu
•
Thank you, Mohan Mainali, for doing what few Nepali journalists
have done to investigate the tragedy of the villagers from
Dhading in Kalikot. Being far away from Nepal, the story
of the bereaved villagers brought tears to my eyes. The
story is today’s Nepal in a microcosm—the violence
and brutality, the apathy, revolutionaries gone berserk,
and an unfeeling government.
Bhim B Thapa,
Hong Kong
•
A few days ago the body of a young man was brought in to
the Teaching Hospital. He had been beaten to death. History
was he was arrested and then jumped or fell from a vehicle.
Sorry, he did not get those injuries that way. The security
forces requested that we not “write about the injuries”.
You can imagine how far that went. They would also not provide
information about identification—apparently wanting
to dispose of the body without the family ever being aware
of what had happened to the man. Until the rule of law is
restored to some degree at least in this country, there
is little hope for anything. As your story “Unfriendly
fire” shows, poor people in the villages are caught
squarely between the Maoists and the security forces—each
one as bad and ruthless as the other, both guilty of torture
and atrocities. Several victims have been brought into the
Emergency Room at the hospital with legs crushed by heavy
rocks as punishment for whatever perceived infractions. |
|
|
|